CoS Car Share
A proposal to turn a car space in your area into a dedicated car share parking bay.
User fees help cover the cost of delivering specific Council services.
Instead of using general rates to fund everything, we charge fees for services that are used by individuals. This way, those who use the services help pay for them, and help Council continue to maintain areas like roads, footpaths and community facilities.
We’ve also reviewed our broader user fees and charges in our 25-26 Budget to ensure they reflect competitive market rates and support the ongoing delivery of services. Any increases have been kept at levels that are manageable and sustainable, helping us recover costs while continuing to provide high-quality services.
When setting our fees, we consider key principles like fairness, cost recovery, and the ‘user-pays’ approach. As a result of benchmarking with other councils and service providers, some areas will see increases above CPI (Consumer Price Index) in the 25-26 Budget year.
Parking Permits
From 1 January 2026, Council is proposing to introduce scaled fees for resident parking permits, starting from the first permit issued. This change follows a review of our permit system and brings us in line with neighbouring councils. However, Stonnington actually offers more parking permits than most other similar councils, and the proposed new fees are still under the average permit cost.
This approach also responds to feedback received during consultation for the Parking Action Plan where respondents said they wanted Council to prioritise residential and visitor parking, and create greater fairness in parking allocation, including permits.
Event fees – birthday parties
There is a proposed minor change to the pricing structure of events at Grattan Gardens and Phoenix Park Community Centres, with a new category of ‘birthday parties’ added. The per session time is up to 6 hours.
Community Consultation 1 July to 21 July 2025
Thank you for your contributions. Below is a summary of all submissions and council's response.
Do you have any feedback on the 2026 fee changes? | Officer response: |
First parking permit per household should remain free - this is a penalty on existing residents, many of the homes in Stonnington do not have off street parking due to heritage reasons and this right to limited parking should be protected | The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
There should be no fees for the first 2 x parking permits. We are residents and already pay high rates. What sort of compensation will be given to the retired?? Why aren’t we charging the Victorian government and their developers for the 1000s of new residents that they have just bought into our community in the high rises. These people have never paid rates in Stonnington, and yet you are asking the residents who have paid for rates for years and years, to pay for the footpaths and community services to compensate for this enormous influx of transient people. Why aren’t you charging the night clubs in Stonnington an extra fee for footpath use and rubbish removal from our streets instead of the residents always paying. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset.
Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
I don’t agree! Why should we pay for permits? When I have just paid for a house and pay my rates? | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. |
I do not support the changes to parking permit fees. | The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
This is an unfair fee for ratepayers in the area where there is already limited off street parking. The council should be ashamed of this blatant cash grab. | To support the efficient use of limited public road space, a tiered pricing structure has been proposed. The first specific vehicle permit is offered at a lower cost to acknowledge essential vehicle needs, while second and subsequent permits are priced higher to reflect reduced necessity and increased competition for space. This approach supports demand management, discourages excessive vehicle ownership, and aligns with Council’s transport objectives to promote sustainable mobility. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Do not change the parking permits! Families are doing it tough already, why add to the cost every year? Once they are in they will never go away or down. We don't even have a garage / alternative parking, fine with you billing people that have a service able garage / car spot and don't use it. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. |
Here’s an idea, instead of slugging residents with extra costs - think outside the box. Deputise (and train) willing/sane residents to book over staying parking. This will help residents be part of the solution AND help council raise revenue at the same time. Work WITH residents, not continually slugg them for more money. Also, resident parking vs shop front facelifts? C’mon. Think about where $$ is spent. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. |
Absolutely a rip off to charge me for a parking permit when my rates are huge ! Some councils give residents a pass so they don’t pay for parking eg at the beach . Stonnington just takes $ | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. |
If the paid parking permits were to go ahead, we should then be rewarded with ‘Permit Parking’ only so we no longer have to battle with people parking from other suburbs. Then you can get your revenue that way - please your residents, not the out of towners. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. Council installs a variety of parking restrictions across the municipality to manage parking demand. Permit Zone restrictions may be considered in areas where there is evidence of high occupancy and limited availability for residents to park near their homes. Restrictions are generally only changed following community consultation and subsequent majority support from the community of the proposed changes. |
What a rort. Cost of living crisis and you want to charge us for the parking permits that allow us to battle the ‘day parkers’ from outer suburbs to park near our houses. Ps: best to not compare our city with Port Phillip which is close to bankrupt and unable to balance their books. Stonnington is one of the highest earning municipalities. This is right up there with setting 30km speed limits in selected streets. Maybe focus booking all the drivers speeding down High Street well above 40km/hr. What will THAT take - another death? Do better for your citizens. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. |
Do not increase price, it is understood if prices rise. But save money cut spending on silly park projects, don’t make us foot the bill. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. |
While I'm happy to read about the proposed budget and the community projects it's going towards, I disagree with part of the parking permit proposal. The house I'm renting with roommates wasn't built with sufficient parking spaces as it is quite old, so the first parking permit being free significantly benefits us, especially with the increased cost of living. Perhaps increasing the cost of 3+ permits to disincentivise crowded parking streets while also earning enough to go towards the suggested budget would be a more considerate solution? | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. To support the efficient use of limited public road space, a tiered pricing structure has been proposed. The first specific vehicle permit is offered at a lower cost to acknowledge essential vehicle needs, while second and subsequent permits are priced higher to reflect reduced necessity and increased competition for space. This approach supports demand management, discourages excessive vehicle ownership, and aligns with Council’s transport objectives to promote sustainable mobility. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
I'm very disappointed with the $60 resident permit fee. If Stonnington is introducing this charge, then I would expect all streets to be converted to permit-only parking. How is it fair that someone from another suburb can park for free, while we have to pay just to park in front of our own homes? | To support the efficient use of limited public road space, a tiered pricing structure has been proposed. The first specific vehicle permit is offered at a lower cost to acknowledge essential vehicle needs, while second and subsequent permits are priced higher to reflect reduced necessity and increased competition for space. This approach supports demand management, discourages excessive vehicle ownership, and aligns with Council’s transport objectives to promote sustainable mobility. Council installs a variety of parking restrictions across the municipality to manage parking demand. Permit Zone restrictions may be considered in areas where there is evidence of high occupancy and limited availability for residents to park near their homes. Restrictions are generally only changed following community consultation and subsequent majority support from the community of the proposed changes. |
I shouldn’t have to pay for a parking permit for my own house. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. |
I am not at all pleased about scaling up the cost of each successive permit. Working families deserve to have cars to travel to work. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Permit parking fees are a blatant tax grab. Unlike other councils, many Stonnington residents in permit areas do not have the option of off street parking. We already pay rates that go towards road/footpath maintenance, why should we pay a second time to park outside our own houses. Couple this with years of exempting building developments from sufficient parking requirements owing to proximity to public transport, council is now trying to punish existing residents for its poor planning decisions. There is a cost of living crisis and council is trying to create more fees for already struggling residents. What is the solution for people who cannot afford an extra yearly fee? We all have in the back of our minds the impending “congestion tax” which again punishes existing residents for population planning that is out of their control. How many new fees should we expect in the coming years? | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. Residents of new multi-unit developments are not eligible for parking permits under the resident parking scheme. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Two free permits should not be issues to homes with off street parking. | There are no current plans to restrict access to permits based on off street parking available at a property, however your feedback will be considered in any future reviews of the resident parking scheme. |
Re: parking permits I live near the intersection of 4 "parking area"s so effectively can only access 25 % of the on-street parking in the vicinity of my home. If fees are to be introduced for any permit this needs to be addressed so I can park within a radius of my home. | There are no current plans to adjust the current parking permit areas, however your feedback will be considered in any future reviews of the resident parking scheme. |
It is challenging to understand the increase in fees, especially around parking permits, which does not feel like the Council is being transparent. It seems inappropriate that households are not provided with at least 1 permit free of charge. | A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
What benefit on earth, does charging me a fee for parking permits that have, since the introduction of parking permits in my street, been free of charge? It is just typically sleazy, avaricious Council revenue raising to feather their own nests, just like your annual rate increases, which are running at about 10% pa when ABS CPI is supposedly running at 2.4% pa as At March 2025. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Yes, I do have feedback. I strongly oppose the introduction of the new parking permit charges in their current form.
While I acknowledge that concession card holders receive a reduced fee, permits are still not free. This adds to the financial strain on those already managing on limited incomes. For others, the proposed fees—$60 for the first permit, $90 for the second, and $120 for a variable permit—are excessive, particularly when this is a service that has previously been provided without charge.
These new costs are being introduced at a time when many residents are already facing increasing pressure from rising interest rates, rent, utilities, fuel, and grocery bills. Introducing yet another fee—especially without any demonstrated benefit or improvement—feels out of step with the financial reality many people are facing. This change adds to the perception that residents are being charged more for less.
In high-demand areas like Peel Street, where residents already struggle to find a park, the introduction of fees without improvements only adds to the frustration. Previous feedback around parking shortages appears to have been ignored.
If Council proceeds with these charges, it must:
Without a clear link between increased fees and improved outcomes, this proposal feels more like revenue-raising than a meaningful solution—and it comes at a time when many households can least afford it. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. To support the efficient use of limited public road space, a tiered pricing structure has been proposed. The first specific vehicle permit is offered at a lower cost to acknowledge essential vehicle needs, while second and subsequent permits are priced higher to reflect reduced necessity and increased competition for space. This approach supports demand management, discourages excessive vehicle ownership, and aligns with Council’s transport objectives to promote sustainable mobility. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. Council installs a variety of parking restrictions across the municipality to manage parking demand. Permit Zone restrictions may be considered in areas where there is evidence of high occupancy and limited availability for residents to park near their homes. Restrictions are generally only changed following community consultation and subsequent majority support from the community of the proposed changes. |
Residents (i.e. rate payers) who already shell out significant amounts for rates annually, shouldn't have to be slugged with extra costs to have a single permit annually, much less in a cost of living crisis. Additional permits make sense to warrant a fee, but with the difficulty of parking outside my own home, particularly with the madness of a sports oval over the road and people parking illegally on a daily basis, I shouldn't be penalised for having chosen to live in Stonnington. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
It’s unfair I have to pay to park in my street when already paying huge rates! $60 and $90 to start and then up and up every year. Unfair Stonnington. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Yes, it's horrendous. Charging hard working citizens during a cost of living crisis to park outside their own home. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Parking restrictions-Edsall street is mainly street parking for residents. Odd numbers are typically owner occupiers while even numbers are rentals. Consider restricted parking permits for renters (1) per house so owner occupiers who pay rates and have more than (1) permit can park in the street in close vicinity to property. Homeowners who pay rates should be entitled to a free parking permit, there already exists a tier fee for additional permits. It is not fair to charge an increase in parking permits when homeowners cannot even park near their homes. What neighbouring councils do is irrelevant to Stonnington council as rates, services and provision of facilities are not the same. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. There are no current plans to restrict access to permits based on whether a resident is a tenant or property owner, however your feedback will be considered in any future reviews of the resident parking scheme. |
It's a real pity that the whole Victorian politicians are only interested in raising fees/rates and taxes in whichever way possible. Never once do we hear that the government is going to reduce rates/fees for anything! Residents used to enjoy going to the beach and Albert Park to exercise but since the introduction of Parking Fees etc a lot of residents and people from other suburbs have decided to avoid them. I also used to enjoy going to Albert Park for walks and picnics but since the introduction of all the parking fees I've not been there instead we visit other suburbs and their parks to enjoy to have a free good day out. It's a real pity - St Kilda had always been popular but now no-one wants to visit especially Fitroy St restaurants which used to be very vibrant and is now DEAD! | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. |
Keep parking permit fees free for the first vehicle and then charge per extra permit. In my street alone I have a family of 4 with 4 cars in an area where there is barely enough for one car per house (Packington St). | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
This is a terrible idea! I pay my council rates, I shouldn't have to pay to park on my own street. I live on Moss Street, with parking on only one side of the street and incredibly lax parking restrictions, so it's often incredibly difficult for resident to find a park, and impossible on weekends - and I'm expected to pay for this! Council has repeatedly done nothing to increase restrictions on Moss Street (i.e. permit zone) to make it easier for residents to find parking. This should be the priority, greater restrictions to make it easier for residents to park - it's really a mandatory requirement if we are expected to pay for parking permits. Happy to talk to someone further. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. Council installs a variety of parking restrictions across the municipality to manage parking demand. Permit Zone restrictions may be considered in areas where there is evidence of high occupancy and limited availability for residents to park near their homes. Restrictions are generally only changed following community consultation and subsequent majority support from the community of the proposed changes. |
We pay our rates and for quite a large percentage of us it involves street parking due to the makeup of the area. Council has been good giving 1 occupant and 1 visitor permit free of charge. But now propose charging for them. Stonnington should be bigger than other Councils and continue its current Policy and not inflict more financial stress on its ratepayers. Particularly in this financial time where general commodities are continuing to rise and keeping up with the cost of living is difficult enough. It would be more appropriate for Council to look within itself for areas to trim their spending. I have lived in South Yarra / Prahran / Windsor for all of my life and the change in this City is extraordinary. The services that Council is paying for out of my rates is growing - is the State Government transferring responsibilities to Council?
Its time the Council got back to the basics. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. |
Hi
Re: https://connectstonnington.vic.gov.au/newfees2026
I just came across this new parking fee charges and I do not believe the driver is to "charge fees for services that are used by individuals. This way, those who use the services help pay for them".
Can you please explain to me what services are being uses that these charges will be covering?
There is no explanation of "the [actual] services being used" that these fees are supposedly paying for. In fact the only Budget Highlight that comes close to this definition is "continued investment in core infrastructure such as roads, footpaths, bridges and drainage works ($13.99 million)". Given the amount of driving I complete on roads that Stonnington is responsible for is quite minimal, again, I don't see how this is a "user pays" system when there is far more non-resident traffic using roads.
Are we going to get Permit Parking only zones in our streets, and removal of the 1h no parking restrictions we currently have to deal with under the current system?
Additionally, can you please explain how a single vehicle costs $60 whereas a 2 vehicle household costs $150, which is 2.5 times the cost?
This seems to be blatant robbery that is just trying to charge more than the rates allow to those residents that have no option but to cop the new fees because they don't have off-street parking facilities.
Lastly, how do I determine who proposed these changes, and which Councilors supported this change?
I look forward to your response.
Thank you. | While general rates contribute to the maintenance of local roads and footpaths, the introduction of a user-pays model ensures that those who derive a private benefit from on-street parking contribute more equitably to the costs and trade-offs associated with that access. A revised permit fee structure has been developed in line with Council’s Revenue and Rating Plan by applying the user-pay principle. This recognises that residential parking permits confer a significant private benefit to individuals by granting access to a limited public asset. The current fee structure, which provides two free residential parking permits per household, has remained unchanged for many years despite growing parking congestion across the municipality. As a result, Council issues over 33,000 permits free of charge annually, effectively subsidising and encouraging car dependency while prioritising scarce public road space for private vehicle use. The proposed pricing was informed by the benchmarking analysis of comparable councils, confirming that the proposed structure is broadly consistent with metropolitan practice. Most peer councils have moved away from fully subsidised schemes and now apply user-pays principles to reflect the increasing cost of managing limited on-street parking resources. In benchmarked Councils, residents are generally eligible for up to 2 permits and eligibility is further limited if off-street parking is available at the property. Stonnington Council has historically allowed between 3 and 5 permits per eligible household with no consideration given to existing off-street parking availability. To ensure the system remains equitable, discounted rates are provided for eligible concession card holders. Whilst the average cost per household will increase with the new fees, the overall cost of parking permits will range from approximately $0.16 per day for 1 permit and up to $1.34 per day for 5 permits. This is considered reasonable given the benefit that is provided. Council installs a variety of parking restrictions across the municipality to manage parking demand. Permit Zone restrictions may be considered in areas where there is evidence of high occupancy and limited availability for residents to park near their homes. Restrictions are generally only changed following community consultation and subsequent majority support from the community of the proposed changes. |
You’ve made it increasingly difficult to actually find out what the fee increase for ‘birthday parties’ is at community centres. I do not support a separate categories or increase the price. Currently Phenix park is the only space affordable for families for parties. Especially in winter. It does not cost council more than any other even to have a birthday party there. The increase is unjustified and purely a revenue raising venture for council that is not in the community interest. | The proposed fee has been informed by benchmarking against similar councils, as well as increasing operational costs, particularly related to cleaning and the need to reset rooms to accommodate growing demand for our spaces. This fee adjustment forms part of Council’s ongoing review of venue hire categories and pricing, and aims to ensure that our venues are managed equitably, sustainably, and in line with both operational requirements and community expectations. The introduction of a specific category for private social events, such as birthday parties, acknowledges the distinct nature and impact of these bookings compared to lower-impact community activities. This approach allows fees to be applied fairly and consistently, while still offering accessible options for families and community members. . |
The personal information requested in this survey is being collected by Council for the purpose of community consultation.
To find out how your personal information will be used by Council please visit the privacy policy page.
A proposal to turn a car space in your area into a dedicated car share parking bay.
Learn more
Amendment C339ston proposes to rezone several existing or planned areas of public open space.
Learn more
Shape how we engage with you by sharing your ideas on our refreshed Community Engagement Policy.
Learn more
We acknowledge we are meeting on the Traditional Lands of the Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung and Bunurong peoples of the East Kulin Nations and pay our respect to their Elders past, present and emerging.
We extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We acknowledge their living connection to Country, relationship with the land and all living things extending back tens of thousands of years.
We speak your language. Select your preferred language, by using the drop-down arrow next to 'English', on the top right-hand-side on this page.
Translated information about Council services is available by clicking on your language below.
Mandarin – 普通话 9280 0730
Cantonese - 廣東話 9280 0731
Greek – Ellīniká 9280 0732
Italian – Italiano 9280 0733
Polish – Polski 9280 0734
Russian – Русский 9280 0735
Indonesian – Bahasa Indonesia 9280 0737
Vietnamese – Tiếng Việt 9280 0748
Have questions or want to learn more about a project, contact us below:
Phone | 8290 1333 |
---|---|
council@stonnington.vic.gov.au | |
Website | www.stonnington.vic.gov.au |
In writing | PO Box 58 Malvern Vic 3144 |
The City of Stonnington believes that the responsible handling of personal information is a key aspect of democratic governance and is strongly committed to protecting an individual's right to privacy. Accordingly, Council is committed to full compliance with its obligations under the Information Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014. In particular, the City of Stonnington will comply with the Information Privacy Principles contained in the Act. Visit our website to access our Privacy Policy.
For details of how Social Pinpoint may access personal information, please refer to Social Pinpoint’s Privacy Policy.
The personal information Council collects is collected for the purpose of facilitating the community engagement process for our services, programs, strategies and plants. The personal information will be used by Council for that primary purpose or directly related purposes.
The demographic information collected will only be reported at the aggregate level. Personal information (if collected - see below) will not otherwise be disclosed unless required by law. Requests for access to and/or amendment of personal information should be made to Council's Privacy Officer by telephoning 03 8290 1333 or emailing council@stonnington.vic.gov.au.
For more information about how Council handles personal information, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
We will collect the following personal information: your name, residential address, email address and mobile number (personal information).
Your personal information will be used for the following primary purposes:
Your name and address is primarily required to ensure feedback is being received by residents or as relevant to the project, and ensures we can provide feedback to you on the outcomes of the consultation.
If you wish to access or alter any of the personal information that you have supplied to Stonnington City Council, please contact Council’s Privacy Officer by telephoning 03 8290 1333 or emailing council@stonnington.vic.gov.au.
For more information about how Council handles personal information, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
The following Terms and Conditions govern the use of Connect Stonnington (“the site”). The software platform is owned by Social Pinpoint Pty Ltd and operated by us, City of Stonnington.
By accessing and using this site, you are choosing to accept and comply with the Terms presented throughout this agreement as well as the Privacy Policy and Moderation Policy. These Terms apply to all visitors and users of this site. Linked sites, affiliated services or third party content or software have their own Terms that you must comply with. If you disagree with any of the Terms presented in this agreement, you may discontinue using the site immediately.
If you are under 18 years old, please ensure that your parent or guardian understands and accepts these Terms and Conditions (including the Privacy Policy and Moderation Policy).
What are the conditions with a user’s account?
While using the site, you must not violate any applicable laws and regulations. It is our duty to protect the confidentiality of content you provide on our site in accordance with our Privacy Policy. When you create an account with us, you must always provide us with accurate information. Failure to provide accurate information violates the Terms, which may result in immediate termination of your account on our service. You are responsible for protecting your own password you use for this site and for any activities done under that password. Unauthorised use of your password or account must be immediately reported to us. In some cases, we or our agents may require access to your user accounts to respond to technical issues.
We are not responsible for the content on the site that has been provided by the users of the site. Any content posted by you is subject to the rules of our Moderation Policy. Your contribution to the site may be edited, removed or not published if we consider it inappropriate (refer to Moderation Policy). Contributors should also be aware that their posts may remain online indefinitely. Where practical, you may choose not to identify yourself, deal with us on an anonymous basis or use a pseudonym.
What do we require from our users?
You must understand and agree that, without limitation:
Can your account be suspended or terminated?
We may terminate or suspend access to your site and/or account immediately, without prior notice, including without limitation if you breach the Terms. We may immediately deactivate or delete your account and all the related files and information in your account. After your account has been terminated, the content you have posted may also remain indefinitely on the site.
If you want to terminate your own account, please send an email to connect@stonnington.vic.gov.au.
Governing Law
These Terms shall be governed in accordance with the laws of Victoria, Australia, without regards to its conflict of law provisions.
Indemnification
The City of Stonnington, its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, agents, licensors and other partners are not responsible for any loss, liability, claim, or demand, including legal fees, made by any third party due to or arising from a breach of this agreement and/or any breach of your representations and warranties set forth above.
What content do we own?
This website contains the copyrighted material, trademarks, patents, trade secrets and other proprietary information (“Intellectual Property”) of the City of Stonnington and its suppliers and licensors. The City of Stonnington owns and retains all proprietary rights in the intellectual property. All intellectual property in the content of this site including without limitation to text, software, source code, pages, documents and online graphics, photographs, sounds, audio, video and other interactive features are owned by or licensed to us.
Any original content that you submit or post on our site may be made available to the public and allows users to share your content (with the end user acknowledging your contribution) under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Australian License.
Except for Intellectual Property which is in the public domain or for which you have been given written permission, you may not copy, alter, transmit, sell, distribute any of the Intellectual Property on this site.
We are not responsible for your communications or dealings, including payment and delivery of goods or services, with a third party found via our website. Any loss or damage incurred from those communications or dealings are solely between the user and the third party.
Disclaimer and Warranties
Users must agree that you use of the site is at your own risk. We make no warranty that the site will meet your requirements or be uninterrupted or error-free. Any material that the user downloads through the site is done at their own risk and are responsible for any damages to their computer system or loss of data.
What happens if these Terms change?
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to modify or replace these Terms at any time without notice. The most recent version of the Terms can be seen on this page. By continuing to access or use our site after those revisions become effective, you agree and will comply to the revised terms. If you do not agree to the revised terms, please discontinue using our site.
Contact Us
If you have any questions about these Terms, please contact us at connect@stonnington.vic.gov.au.
Enter your email address below. We will send you instructions to reset your password.
Back to Log in
Creating an account helps us better understand your needs and the needs of the community.
Already have an account? Log in now
Thank you, your account has been created.
Completing the questions below helps us better understand the diverse range of people who contribute their ideas. The questions are optional.
You’re using an outdated browser.
Some features of this website may not work correctly. To get a better experience we strongly recommend you download a new browser for free:
Would you like to follow this project to receive email updates?